Home » Education » Continuing Education » Continuing Education Development » Course Proposal Evaluation Form

Course & Webcast Proposal Evaluation Form

Directions:

  • Quantitative: Each item question is explained below its title and is followed by a rating scale.  Score each with a 1-5 ranking to indicate your assessment of the veracity of that statement based on your review of the proposal information.
  • Qualitative: In the comments section for each item, please respond to the additional questions posed and any related issues that this workshop raises for you.
  • Provide any additional assessments or comments not relevant to one of the specific, numbered areas in the space preceeding the ratings.

Title of the course or webcast

Name(s)

Name

Date of Review

1. Does the content appeal to its specified audience? Does it indicate specific categories of archivists and/or levels of expertise to assist potential participants in determining the course/workshop's relevance for them?

Choose the appropriate rating; use 1=low, undesirable, to 5=high, excellent.

To what extent does the subject matter reflect current archival practices and theory commonly accepted in the profession?

Choose the appropriate rating; use 1=low, undesirable, to 5=high, excellent.

Does this content bridge, enhance, and/or build on other DAS courses? If so, please name these course. For DAS course listings,
click here.

Choose the appropriate rating; use 1=low, undesirable, to 5=high, excellent.

Does this content address two or more DAS Competencies? For competencies, click here.

Choose the appropriate rating; use 1=low, undesirable, to 5=high, excellent.

How relevant/appropriate are the teaching and delivery methodologies (lecture, video, PowerPoint, exercises, film, audiotape, discussion, simulation, case study, opportunities for in-course feedback, etc.) to the articulated goals and objectives, and to the content?"

Choose the appropriate rating; use 1=low, undesirable, to 5=high, excellent.

How would you rate the expertise and ability of the instructor(s) as evidenced by the CV, experience with classroom or adult education instruction, and/or courses and workshops on teaching methods?

Choose the appropriate rating; use 1=low, undesirable, to 5=high, excellent.

Choose the appropriate rating; use 1=low, undesirable, to 5=high, excellent.

Choose the appropriate rating; use 1=low, undesirable, to 5=high, excellent.

How workable is the time line or agenda for the course? Is there sufficient detail to indicate how the workshop will evolve? Does it allow sufficient time for active engagement between course participants and the instructor(s)?

Choose the appropriate rating; use 1=low, undesirable, to 5=high, excellent.

To what degree does the list of assigned readings support the content of the proposal?

Choose the appropriate rating; use 1=low, undesirable, to 5=high, excellent.

Does the presentation support the Learning Outcomes?

Choose the appropriate rating; use 1=low, undesirable, to 5=high, excellent.

Do the exam questions correlate appropriately to the content?

Choose the appropriate rating; use 1=low, undesirable, to 5=high, excellent.

Is the recommended prior "experience/knowledge appropriate?

Choose the appropriate rating; use 1=low, undesirable, to 5=high, excellent.

If a Laptop requirement is noted, is it appropriate based on exercises, etc.?

Choose the appropriate rating; use 1=low, undesirable, to 5=high, excellent.

Additional comments on any aspect of this proposal.

Updated: 2017-04-21

Education